Significance and Limitations of the Royal Prerogative Essay

Significance and Limitations of the magnificent Prerogative - Essay ExampleIn the 1700s, debates regarding the extent of the Royal Prerogative powers ensued. This was further aggravated by the execution of one King and the expulsion of Charles I in 1649 and James II in 1688. Discussions on the answer culminated with the passing of the 1689 Bill of Rights, which considered the use, and abuse of certain specific royal prerogatives as unlawful. It was concluded that most of the prerogative powers may be formd only upon the advice of ministers, and although the Monarch bear certain powers which can be exercised independently such as the power of appointment and removal of ministers and ministries, the royal power found it difficult to freely exercise its prerogatives, especially if it is in contravention of the advice of the Parliament. The following are some of the powers vested under the Royal Prerogative (1) Calling for and dissolving of the parliament, calling of elections (2) Gi ving of royal give in to legislation (3) Preparing plans to confer benefits to citizens (4) Granting of clemency, pardoning of convicts, or reducing penalties thereof (5) Entering into treaties, declaring war and making peace, controlling the issuance of passports and preventing foreigners from entering the rude (6) Controlling, organizing and disposing of the armed forces (7) Appointing of judicial officers, ministers, and separate public officers (8) Procuring of ships (9) Printing of authorized versions of the Holy Bible.The royal prerogative to establish and enter into diplomatic relations with other countries or states played a remarkable role in the formation of a strategic alliance that has been an important factor in international relations. The wisdom of determining whether or not the country should befriend another country, and which country or countries it should be, is properly laid on the Crown/Monarch. The latter is in a better position to evaluate the have of rel ations with other jurisdictions. The long process of debates and arguments in the Parliament is considered unnecessary as it involves a purely executive function. Also, since it is the Crown/Monarch who personally engages himself in these functions, it is but proper that such power be exercised by him, to the exclusion of the Parliament.